Sedition against a sitting US President? New J6 whistleblowers bust the case wide open

From Revolver News:

The left’s J6 narrative hinges on the idea that President Trump was orchestrating an “insurrection” to overthrow the US government. But think about it—if that were true, wouldn’t he want as few cops around as possible? Yet, Trump actually requested 10,000 National Guard troops to be at the scene. It doesn’t add up, right? How does that fit their wild “insurrection” story? If you’re planning to overthrow the government, why on earth would you ask for more law enforcement to be there? That pesky little fact blew so many holes in the uni-party narrative. Meanwhile, those traitors on the J6 Committee knew full well that President Trump had requested the National Guard, but they buried that fact because it totally wrecked their “insurrection” theory. But as always, the truth has a way of coming out, doesn’t it?

Committee on House Administration:

Following Mollie Hemingway’s reporting, Chairman Loudermilk released the following statement:

“The former J6 Select Committee apparently withheld Mr. Ornato’s critical witness testimony from the American people because it contradicted their pre-determined narrative,” said Chairman Loudermilk. “Mr. Ornato’s testimony proves what Mr. Meadows has said all along, President Trump did in fact offer 10,000 National Guard troops to secure the U.S. Capitol, which was turned down.

“This is just one example of important information the former Select Committee hid from the public because it contradicted what they wanted the American people to believe. And, this is exactly why my investigation is committed to uncovering all the facts, no matter the outcome.”

That bombshell should have been enough to shut down the whole “insurrection” charade, but obviously, it didn’t. And now, thanks to a group of National Guard whistleblowers, the J6 “insurrection” theory is not just falling apart—it’s crumbling spectacularly. This new information—straight from the horse’s mouth—is so shocking that it’s got many Americans wondering if their own government committed sedition against a sitting US President.

What exactly is “sedition“?

Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech or organization, that tends toward rebellion against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent toward, or insurrection against, established authority.

It sounds like something the Deep State would do, right?

The X account Bad Kitty recently stirred the pot with a post about new whistleblower revelations and posed that very provocative question: Did the US Government commit sedition against a sitting US President?

Bad Kitty Unleashed:

Did the Pentagon commit sedition upon a sitting US president?

Three DC National Guard whistleblowers say they WERE ready to be deployed on January 6 on Trump’s orders but were held back by the Pentagon in bombshell testimony contradicting Capitol riot committee’s story!

The officers, who were with Walker the day of the Capitol riot, will detail how they were on buses in full tactical gear for hours waiting for the go-ahead from the Army.

Additionally, the whistleblowers will reveal how the January 6 Committee did not want to hear their testimony because it corroborated Trump and his allies’ claims that the former president did authorize the National Guard days in advance to respond to any violence or unrest on January 6, 2021.

Not only are these whistleblowers confirming what President Trump has consistently claimed—that he repeatedly tried to deploy the National Guard to the Capitol—but they’re also exposing just how diabolical our government can be.

Daily Mail:

Whistleblowers from the Washington D.C. National Guard will tell Congress that Donald Trump did want them deployed during the Capitol riot and the Army delayed telling them to mobilize in a bombshell hearing next week. can exclusively reveal that at least three officers will appear Wednesday before a House subcommittee to claim their stories were also ignored by the Democrat-led January 6 committee, because it didn’t fit their narrative.

The hearing will aim to further prove that Acting Defense Secretary at the time Christopher Miller did give advance approval of D.C. National Guard deployment at the direction of then-President Donald Trump.

A person familiar with the review by the House Administration Committee’s Oversight Subcommittee said the whistleblowers will provide testimony that then-Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy delayed by at least two hours providing official notice to D.C. National Guard Commander William Walker to deploy troops to the Capitol.

A person familiar with the review by the House Administration Committee’s Oversight Subcommittee said the whistleblowers will provide testimony that then-Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy delayed by at least two hours providing official notice to D.C. National Guard Commander William Walker to deploy troops to the Capitol.

The whistleblower testimony reveals how January 6th has been exploited by the current regime to deceive, slander, and harshly punish many innocent individuals, something Revolver has been calling out for years now. Recently, Revolver dropped a bombshell article on the J6 “Mop Up Man” that’s sure to blow you away.


When asked about the flagrant and explicable lack of concern in relation to the pipe bomb, a more senior Capitol Police official who spoke for the group offered the following shocking response: the nonchalant response of the Secret Service and Capitol Police to the pipe bomb was deliberately designed so as not to cause panic among the public. Think of that: we’re supposed to believe that Secret Service agents and Capitol Police stood lackadaisically within feet of what could have been a live explosive device and allowed a group of children to walk within feet of said device in order to not cause panic. This answer alone suggests that not only are they clearly covering up the real story, they possess such confidence that they didn’t even have to bother to come up with a more plausible cover story. If you believe that, we’ve got a bridge in Brooklyn or a Fedsurrection in D.C. to sell you, folks!


We are now in a position to expose the identity of the most senior Capitol Police official in that meeting and the man who reportedly presented congressional officials and staffers with the absurd excuse that the Capitol Police and Secret Service allowed a group of children to walk in front of the bomb so as not to cause panic—a baffling explanation for such a flagrant breach of protocol as to be unbelievable to the point of offense. That Capitol Police official is Ashan Benedict, currently Assistant Chief of Police of the Capitol Police in charge of Protective and Intelligence Operations. Yes, you read that right. A man who would excuse the flagrant violation of security protocol as depicted in the footage of the DNC bomb discovery is the head of Protective Operations at the Capitol Police. This alone should be sufficient to cause a national scandal, but it gets far worse. Ashan Benedict’s conduct and statements in the meeting described above, together with new (yet entirely overlooked) information that has come out as a result of a recent Judicial Watch FOIA request, lead us to believe with a high degree of conviction that Ashan M. Benedict is one of the key cover-up men of the entire January 6 pipe bomb hoax.

You can read the entire Revolver exclusive below:

Mop-Up Man: Is This Former ATF Agent Running the J6 Pipe Bomb Coverup?

Based on this report, it’s painfully clear that a specific group of people made sure the National Guard wasn’t deployed on January 6th. They spread baseless fears that President Trump would invoke the “Insurrection Act” to use the Guard to cling to power. The absence of the National Guard was crucial to their scheme. Without 10,000 troops maintaining order, it was easier to stir up chaos and position their federal operatives strategically during the events of that day.

With all the unanswered questions and lingering mysteries about January 6th, the more information that leaks out, the more you have to wonder if figures like Pelosi and others orchestrated the event to divert attention from a stolen election and attempt to erase MAGA from the political landscape once and for all.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *