Regarding the current unpleasantness

Black Lives Matter has crossed the line.  Big League Politics has the story:

A speaker at a Black Lives Matter rally in Washington, D.C exploded into a violent rant when he spoke on a megaphone to a mob of protestors and rioters.

Comments from GBRA’s President:Lest We Forget : The White House Birthed “The Peaceful Protesters” Movement

You may call this old news, but it has stuck in my craw as a shining example of how everything this President does is falsified in real time. This is why so many idiot-brained Republicans call him The  Liar in Chief! 
If and when the truth is finally published, it is buried, hidden, washed, or deemed old news. I want to get this out to remind our people not to be discouraged, not to believe the credible sounding debunking of everything our President says, even if it comes from big news outlets, or spoken by the big mouths of Rhinos! And I want them to never fall for the title “Peaceful Protesters,”  because that tilte is always reserved for only one side, the well funded and organized, violent mobster army of anarchists. 
Speaking of which, for those with selective memory issues, here is a recent history Q & A:
Q:   Does anyone recall when Obama said he wanted to establish a new civilian force better equipped than the military?
Lest We Forget:

se•di•tion sĭ-dĭsh′ən

  • n.
    Conduct or language inciting rebellion against the authority of a state.
  • n.
    Insurrection; rebellion.
  • n.
    A factious commotion in a state; the stirring up of such a commotion; incitement of discontent against government and disturbance of public tranquillity, as by inflammatory speeches or writings, or acts or language tending to breach of publi

18 U.S. Code § 2101.Riots

prev | next
(a)Whoever travels in interstate or foreign commerce or uses any facility of interstate or foreign commerce, including, but not limited to, the mail, telegraph, telephone, radio, or television, with intent—


to incite a riot; or

to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot; or

to commit any act of violence in furtherance of a riot; or

to aid or abet any person in inciting or participating in or carrying on a riot or committing any act of violence in furtherance of a riot;
and who either during the course of any such travel or use or thereafter performs or attempts to perform any other overt act for any purpose specified in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) of this paragraph— [1]
Shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

In any prosecution under this section, proof that a defendant engaged or attempted to engage in one or more of the overt acts described in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) of paragraph (1) of subsection (a) [2] and (1) has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce, or (2) has use of or used any facility of interstate or foreign commerce, including but not limited to, mail, telegraph, telephone, radio, or television, to communicate with or broadcast to any person or group of persons prior to such overt acts, such travel or use shall be admissible proof to establish that such defendant traveled in or used such facility of interstate or foreign commerce.

A judgment of conviction or acquittal on the merits under the laws of any State shall be a bar to any prosecution hereunder for the same act or acts.

Whenever, in the opinion of the Attorney General or of the appropriate officer of the Department of Justice charged by law or under the instructions of the Attorney General with authority to act, any person shall have violated this chapter, the Department shall proceed as speedily as possible with a prosecution of such person hereunder and with any appeal which may lie from any decision adverse to the Government resulting from such prosecution.

Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to make it unlawful for any person to travel in, or use any facility of, interstate or foreign commerce for the purpose of pursuing the legitimate objectives of organized labor, through orderly and lawful means.

Nothing in this section shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of Congress to prevent any State, any possession or Commonwealth of the United States, or the District of Columbia, from exercising jurisdiction over any offense over which it would have jurisdiction in the absence of this section; nor shall anything in this section be construed as depriving State and local law enforcement authorities of responsibility for prosecuting acts that may be violations of this section and that are violations of State and local law.

Leave a Reply