More effects of the Covid 19 experimental injection
As time moves on and the effects of the experimental genetic injections become more evident, studies are being conducted despite the constant drumbeat of “safe and effective” morph into “they don’t really work but everybody needs more of them.” Amidst the endless thunder of Big Pharma’s breathless announcements of more and ever more “cases” what you will not hear is what independent scientists are finding among the great mass of the Vaxxed, the Double Vasxxed and the Multiply Boosted.
I hate it when I’m right.
I noted that the original myocarditis data, which was claimed to be “rare”, contained what looked like an indicator of exponential damage. That is, the second jab was much more likely than the first to produce trouble in that regard.
As is apparent from a very large study group in Britain, the data continues to show that series is valid but also has a much-more troubling aspect to it, in that it appears that the Moderna jabs are worse than the Pfizer ones. This is important because much more mRNA is in the Moderna jabs. Further, the exponential factor appears to be a doubling with each dose for the Pfizer shots, which means the risk is a power function and not linear, and the fact that now we have booster data and the series has continued means the risk does not bleed off back to baseline over time.
We don’t know with the Moderna jabs when it comes to boosters as there were not enough boosters given to get statistical power.
But the second shot showed sixteen times the risk from baseline instead of four for Pfizer.
The ugly news is that the Pfizer jabs are 30ug of mRNA each. Moderna’s are 100ug. So two Pfizers is 60ug total for a 4x increase, where two Modernas is 200ug total for a 16x increase. In other words for Pfizer its about 15ug/step, where for Moderna its 12.5ug/step.
That’s pretty close statistically and implies there is a direct dose-response relationship, the relationship is exponential rather than linear and the issue is not related to the process used by each manufacturer either, which means this isn’t manufacturer-specific.
In other words the implication is that there is in fact no safe option.
What’s also really bad is that there’s some evidence the myocarditis produced by these jabs is at least as bad and maybe worse — that is, more-lethal — than that produced by other causes.
That we can’t really be certain of yet, particularly considering that myocarditis has a typical time element associated with heart failure. In other words it often doesn’t get you immediately, but rather does a few years later. Whether that will happen here we do not know because the roughly five year time period required to know has not yet passed.
Further, there is no reason to believe that this damage is limited to these two conditions. Indeed endothelial inflammation is one of the key items that also produces heart attacks and strokes, neither of which is specific to young men. It must be assumed these jabs also wildly potentiate heart attacks and strokes down the road and that the elevation of risk for those is exponential with additional jabs as well until proved otherwise.
That damage and elevation of risk, given the dose-dependency seen and non-return to baseline prior to boosting is probably permanent.
There is evidence for this too which is intentionally not being chased down and documented. Were it to be it would instantaneously and permanently render you unable to pass medical underwriting for life insurance, as just one example. It would also likely render anyone who had taken the jab ineligible for medical clearance in those roles where you need it — for example, driving a commercial truck or flying a plane. It has been standard practice for decades that anyone who dies of a non-obvious cause at a young age (e.g. not shot, in a car accident, etc.) must be autopsied and the findings investigated because it just doesn’t happen very often.
Up until now, that is, when it happens all the time and nobody is looking — on purpose.
What’s clear from the data at this point, however, is that for young males under 25 this particular aspect is especially dangerous and since its dose-dependent the more “boosts” you get the more-likely you are to get screwed.
I hate it when I find a signal early on, flag it as suspicious, nobody cares and later on the data comes in and as it does it increasingly confirms that the suspicion was correct.
Go ahead folks, kill yourselves to virtue signal all over social media.
If you let someone jab you that’s what you’re risking and if you do it often enough, given an exponential risk (it looks like permanent elevation of risk is roughly squared per 30ug unit of dose, when you get down to it) the bad outcome is not going to be “rare” or “unexpected” at all.
If you jab your kids or participate in assisting or approving them going somewhere (like a college) that requires such you’re a monster who is literally coercing or even demanding your children make savings throws .vs. death, and if you do it enough times….
UPDATE: It’s not just the British scientists who are reaching worrisome conclusions about the relationship between the mRNA vaccines and myocarditis.
There is a significant increase in the risk of acute myocarditis/pericarditis following Comirnaty [the approved mRNA “vaccine” actually approved by the FDA but not yet available in the U.S.] vaccination among Chinese male adolescents, especially after the second dose.
Here’s Dr. Zelenko with more info and a different take on it: